|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Leite. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgl.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
Data corrente: |
07/07/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/08/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
OSS, D. B.; MACHADO, F. S.; TOMICH, T. R.; PEREIRA, L. G. R.; CAMPOS, M. M.; CASTRO, M. M. D; SILVA, T. E. DA; MARCONDES, M. I. |
Afiliação: |
D. B. Oss, UFV/VIÇOSA; FERNANDA SAMARINI MACHADO, CNPGL; THIERRY RIBEIRO TOMICH, CNPGL; LUIZ GUSTAVO RIBEIRO PEREIRA, CNPGL; MARIANA MAGALHAES CAMPOS, CNPGL; M.M. D. Castro, UFV/VIÇOSA; T. E. da Silva, UFV/VIÇOSA; M. I. Marcondes, UFV/VIÇOSA. |
Título: |
Energy and protein requirements of crossbred (Holstein x Gyr) growing bulls. |
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Dairy Science, v. 100, n. 4, p. 2603-2613, 2017. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11414 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this study was to estimate the energy and protein requirements of crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) growing bulls. Twenty-four 10-mo-old bulls [initial body weight (BW) = 184 ± 23.4 kg] were used in a comparative slaughter trial. Six bulls were slaughtered at the beginning of the experiment as the reference group, to estimate initial empty body weight (EBW) and energy and protein contents of the remaining animals. The remaining bulls were assigned to a completely randomized design with 3 levels of dry matter intake and 6 replicates. The levels of dry matter intake were 1.2% of BW, 1.8% of BW, and ad libitum to target orts equal to 5% of the total amount that was fed. The remaining bulls were slaughtered at the end of the experiment. The bulls were fed a diet consisting of 59.6% corn silage and 40.4% concentrate on a dry matter basis. The equation that determined the relationship between EBW and BW was EBW = (0.861 ± 0.0031) × BW. The relationship between empty body gain (EBG) and average daily gain (ADG) was demonstrated by the following equation: EBG = (0.934 ± 0.0111) × ADG. Net energy for maintenance (NEM) was 74.8 ± 2.89 kcal/kg of EBW0.75 per day, and metabolizable energy for maintenance (MEM) was 120.8 kcal/kg of EBW0.75 per day. The detected efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance (km) was 61.9%. The equation used to estimate net energy for gain (NEG) was as follows: NEG = (0.049 ± 0.0011) × EBW0.75 × EBG0.729 ± 0.0532. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for gain (kg) was 35.7%. The metabolizable protein for maintenance (MPM) was 3.05 g/kg of BW0.75. The equation used to estimate net protein requirements for gain (NPG) = (87.138 ± 65.1378 × EBG) + [(40.436 ± 21.3640) × NEG]. The efficiency of use of metabolizable protein for gain (k) was 35.7%. We concluded that the estimates of energy and protein requirements presented herein are more appropriate than the National Research Council dairy cattle model and the Brazilian BR-CORTE system to balance the diets of crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) growing bulls. MenosThe objective of this study was to estimate the energy and protein requirements of crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) growing bulls. Twenty-four 10-mo-old bulls [initial body weight (BW) = 184 ± 23.4 kg] were used in a comparative slaughter trial. Six bulls were slaughtered at the beginning of the experiment as the reference group, to estimate initial empty body weight (EBW) and energy and protein contents of the remaining animals. The remaining bulls were assigned to a completely randomized design with 3 levels of dry matter intake and 6 replicates. The levels of dry matter intake were 1.2% of BW, 1.8% of BW, and ad libitum to target orts equal to 5% of the total amount that was fed. The remaining bulls were slaughtered at the end of the experiment. The bulls were fed a diet consisting of 59.6% corn silage and 40.4% concentrate on a dry matter basis. The equation that determined the relationship between EBW and BW was EBW = (0.861 ± 0.0031) × BW. The relationship between empty body gain (EBG) and average daily gain (ADG) was demonstrated by the following equation: EBG = (0.934 ± 0.0111) × ADG. Net energy for maintenance (NEM) was 74.8 ± 2.89 kcal/kg of EBW0.75 per day, and metabolizable energy for maintenance (MEM) was 120.8 kcal/kg of EBW0.75 per day. The detected efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance (km) was 61.9%. The equation used to estimate net energy for gain (NEG) was as follows: NEG = (0.049 ± 0.0011) × EBW0.75 × EBG0.729 ± 0.0532. The efficiency of us... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Company growth; Food and nutrition; Growth of calves; Holstein-Friesian cattle. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
Marc: |
LEADER 02896naa a2200265 a 4500 001 2072192 005 2022-08-09 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11414$2DOI 100 1 $aOSS, D. B. 245 $aEnergy and protein requirements of crossbred (Holstein x Gyr) growing bulls.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2017 520 $aThe objective of this study was to estimate the energy and protein requirements of crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) growing bulls. Twenty-four 10-mo-old bulls [initial body weight (BW) = 184 ± 23.4 kg] were used in a comparative slaughter trial. Six bulls were slaughtered at the beginning of the experiment as the reference group, to estimate initial empty body weight (EBW) and energy and protein contents of the remaining animals. The remaining bulls were assigned to a completely randomized design with 3 levels of dry matter intake and 6 replicates. The levels of dry matter intake were 1.2% of BW, 1.8% of BW, and ad libitum to target orts equal to 5% of the total amount that was fed. The remaining bulls were slaughtered at the end of the experiment. The bulls were fed a diet consisting of 59.6% corn silage and 40.4% concentrate on a dry matter basis. The equation that determined the relationship between EBW and BW was EBW = (0.861 ± 0.0031) × BW. The relationship between empty body gain (EBG) and average daily gain (ADG) was demonstrated by the following equation: EBG = (0.934 ± 0.0111) × ADG. Net energy for maintenance (NEM) was 74.8 ± 2.89 kcal/kg of EBW0.75 per day, and metabolizable energy for maintenance (MEM) was 120.8 kcal/kg of EBW0.75 per day. The detected efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance (km) was 61.9%. The equation used to estimate net energy for gain (NEG) was as follows: NEG = (0.049 ± 0.0011) × EBW0.75 × EBG0.729 ± 0.0532. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for gain (kg) was 35.7%. The metabolizable protein for maintenance (MPM) was 3.05 g/kg of BW0.75. The equation used to estimate net protein requirements for gain (NPG) = (87.138 ± 65.1378 × EBG) + [(40.436 ± 21.3640) × NEG]. The efficiency of use of metabolizable protein for gain (k) was 35.7%. We concluded that the estimates of energy and protein requirements presented herein are more appropriate than the National Research Council dairy cattle model and the Brazilian BR-CORTE system to balance the diets of crossbred (Holstein × Gyr) growing bulls. 653 $aCompany growth 653 $aFood and nutrition 653 $aGrowth of calves 653 $aHolstein-Friesian cattle 700 1 $aMACHADO, F. S. 700 1 $aTOMICH, T. R. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, L. G. R. 700 1 $aCAMPOS, M. M. 700 1 $aCASTRO, M. M. D 700 1 $aSILVA, T. E. DA 700 1 $aMARCONDES, M. I. 773 $tJournal of Dairy Science$gv. 100, n. 4, p. 2603-2613, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
Data corrente: |
04/03/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/10/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 2 |
Autoria: |
MONTEIRO, M. L. G.; DELIZA, R.; MARSICO, Eliane T.; ALCANTARA, M. de; CASTRO, I. P. L.; CONTE-JUNIOR, C. A. |
Afiliação: |
MARIA LUCIA G. MONTEIRO, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; Universidade Federal Fluminense -UFF; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA; ELIANE T. MARSICO, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF; MARCELA DE ALCANTARA, CNPq; ISABELE P. L. DE CASTRO, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; CARLOS A. CONTE-JUNIOR, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ; Universidade Federal Fluminense -UFF. |
Título: |
What Do Consumers Think About Foods Processed by Ultraviolet Radiation and Ultrasound? |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Foods, v. 11, n. 3, 434, 2022. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030434 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
his study aimed to investigate Brazilian consumers' perception concerning foods processed by ultraviolet (UV) radiation and ultrasound (US) and define consumer segments considering their socioeconomic characteristics and eating habits towards industrialized products through free word association tasks answered by 1004 participants via an online platform. UV- and US-treated foods were more frequently related to unfamiliar words/terms (21.51 and 36.95%) and negative associations (36.25 and 26.70%) than positive ones (29.89 and 24.20%), respectively. Unfamiliarity and health risk concerns were more reported for US-treated foods by women aged 18-25 and >= 46 with low income, and low and frequent industrialized products consumption, as well as for UV-treated foods by consumers <= 35 years old with low and medium income, and low and frequent industrialized products consumption. This indicates that more clear and trustworthy information is needed before introducing these products in the Brazilian market, mainly for potential target consumer groups identified in this study. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Emerging non-thermal technologies novel technologies UV light high-intensity ultrasound free word association; TECHNOLOGIES ACCEPTANCE ATTITUDES WILLINGNESS PRODUCTS SAFETY RISK. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Food technology. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232184/1/foods-11-00434-v2.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01918naa a2200229 a 4500 001 2140592 005 2022-10-10 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030434$2DOI 100 1 $aMONTEIRO, M. L. G. 245 $aWhat Do Consumers Think About Foods Processed by Ultraviolet Radiation and Ultrasound?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $ahis study aimed to investigate Brazilian consumers' perception concerning foods processed by ultraviolet (UV) radiation and ultrasound (US) and define consumer segments considering their socioeconomic characteristics and eating habits towards industrialized products through free word association tasks answered by 1004 participants via an online platform. UV- and US-treated foods were more frequently related to unfamiliar words/terms (21.51 and 36.95%) and negative associations (36.25 and 26.70%) than positive ones (29.89 and 24.20%), respectively. Unfamiliarity and health risk concerns were more reported for US-treated foods by women aged 18-25 and >= 46 with low income, and low and frequent industrialized products consumption, as well as for UV-treated foods by consumers <= 35 years old with low and medium income, and low and frequent industrialized products consumption. This indicates that more clear and trustworthy information is needed before introducing these products in the Brazilian market, mainly for potential target consumer groups identified in this study. 650 $aFood technology 653 $aEmerging non-thermal technologies novel technologies UV light high-intensity ultrasound free word association 653 $aTECHNOLOGIES ACCEPTANCE ATTITUDES WILLINGNESS PRODUCTS SAFETY RISK 700 1 $aDELIZA, R. 700 1 $aMARSICO, Eliane T. 700 1 $aALCANTARA, M. de 700 1 $aCASTRO, I. P. L. 700 1 $aCONTE-JUNIOR, C. A. 773 $tFoods$gv. 11, n. 3, 434, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (CTAA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|